What sort of country are we becoming?
Stephen Walt has a very good answer to that question:
Finally, the next president needs to do some
hard thinking about the kind of country the United States is becoming. The United States has fought four wars since
1990, and is currently conducting drone strikes and special operations in a
half a dozen countries. We are deeply worried about cyber-war and
cyber-security, but we are also using these weapons for offensive purposes in
ways that we would regard as wholly illegitimate if someone did it to us.
In the same way, American experts now discuss
"preventive war" in remarkably casual terms, as if it were just one of many strategic options. They seem to forget
that by definition, preventive war means attacking countries that have not attacked us and are not about to do so. "Preventive
war" was what Japan did to us at Pearl Harbor, and ambitious young policy wonks
now prescribe it without much self-reflection and seemingly unaware that real
human lives are at stake.
Instead of the citizen army that we relied upon
in World War I, World War II, and Korea, we now have a professional military
that receives enormous deference from politicians, pundits, academics, and the
public. U.S. politicians rarely have
military experience -- Clinton, Bush 43, Obama, and Romney never served, and
neither have any of their children -- and this fact inevitably affects their
relations with the military establishment. Neither Obama nor Romney said a critical word
about the military during any of their debates, even though the quality of military leadership
and advice in both Iraq and Afghanistan has been
deficient. U.S. politicians rarely talk
about peace anymore; instead, they try to sound tough-minded and ever-willing
to use force.
Since 9/11, we have created a vast array of
intelligence and counter-terrorist organizations whose activities are
largely hidden from the citizens who are paying for them and who
will bear the consequences if their actions are misguided. Both common sense and much history teaches us
that lack of transparency and accountability usually breeds bad behavior, and we
may one day be shocked when we find out what's been done in our country's name over the past decade.
Who will play watchdog? Not most academics, who are too busy with
ivory-tower exercises and for the most part discomfited by national security
issues. Not the mainstream media, which
depends on cozy relations with those in power.
Not the DC think tanks funded by the defense industry and
employing would-be or former officials eager to preserve their career options (and
consulting businesses).
So, in addition to all those other challenges, I
hope the next president will start unwinding some of the practices we
adopted
in the aftermath of 9/11, and move us back to being a country that is
slower to
anger, more interested in diplomacy, and not quite as trigger happy. But
I wouldn't bet on it, because he'll be too busy dealing with the rest
of his agenda, plus the inevitable surprises that will rise up to bite
him.
No comments:
Post a Comment