Can it be managed responsibly? Robert Gates seems to doubt it when in 2011 he said that DOD is "an amalgam of fiefdoms without centralized mechanisms to allocate resources, track expenditures, and measure results. ... My staff and I learned that it was nearly impossible to get accurate information and answers to questions such as ‘How much money did you spend' and ‘How many people do you have?' "
Reuters has grouped the blunders into five categories:
TOO MUCH STUFF
Here's a comment from Navy Vice Admiral Mark Harnitchek, the director of the Defense Logistics Agency,"We have about $14 billion of inventory for lots of reasons, and probably half of that is excess to what we need." Yet, they keep buying; as of September 30, 2012, they had $733 million worth of supplies and equipment on order that was already stocked in excess amounts on warehouse shelves. That figure was up 21% from $609 million a year earlier. The Defense Department defines "excess inventory" as anything more than a three-year supply.
OLD AND DANGEROUS
Supply depots have runway flares from the 1940s. More than one-third of the weapons and munitions the Joint Munitions Command stores at depots is obsolete.
COSTLY REPAIRSThe report rattles off a number of computer systems that didn't do the job, costing us billions of dollars.
CONTRACT HITS
The Defense Contract Audit Agency is charged with making sure that a contract was fulfilled and the money ended up in the right place. They have a 'small' backlog of over 20,000 contracts to audit; some go back to 1996. Did we get what we paid for? Who knows?
PLUGGING ALONGThis refers to cases where DOD's numbers don't match Treasury's. DOD makes up the numbers and calls them "reconciling amounts". This amounted to $9.22 billion in 2012.
No comments:
Post a Comment