A Different Argument

Jonathan Moreno argues against intelligent design on the basis that it harms our national security. I've never seen this argument before, but it makes a great deal of sense, especially in an age where it is getting easier and easier to create lethal weapons that can create mass destruction. Moreno asserts that science is the key to creating and defending against these weapons. Failure to do so will be the result of teaching intelligent design, a non-science.