Monday, February 27, 2006

How do you define 'proficient?'

Following up on some of my earlier comments on our educational system, I point out a very interesting chart in today's Wall Street Journal with regard to the percent of eighth graders considered proficient by the state and those considered proficient as a result of their taking the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) test. Just take two states at random. In Connecticut's tests 75% are rated proficient in reading and 76% in math. When these kids took the NAEP test, their results were not as good: 34% in reading, 35% in math. Georgia has similar results; their tests show 83% proficient in reading and 59% in math. In the NAEP test the results were 24% in reading and 22% in math.

The problem is that the No Child Left Behind Act allows states to define 'proficient' anyway they want. Obviously, there should be a uniform standard. Without a national standard how can we know how well our kids are doing against the competition here, let alone the competition around the world they will face when they grow up?

No comments: